Bosses support monitoring home workers
A majority of business leaders in the UK are in favour of using at least one measure to monitor the performance of employees working from home, according to a new survey.
Related reading from Relocate Global
- Homeworking 'more or as productive' finds new CIPD research
- CIPD calls for greater transparency on workforce reporting
- Where people and purpose mean business
Limiting employee burnout
The survey of more than 2,000 executives found that 55 per cent of them backed collecting information on regular home workers, including time spent on laptops each day and email-sending behaviour, to identify the risk of burnout.Currently, however, only 28 per cent of organisations said their organisations were using software to monitor the productivity of these workers.Hayfa Mohdzaini, Senior Research Adviser at the CIPD, said: “The move to increased hybrid and remote working has fuelled the debate on employee monitoring practices and what is acceptable.“Depending on the context, collecting information on home workers can be a positive thing, supporting employee performance and wellbeing, by identifying signs of excessive workloads and burnout."And certainly, it can be necessary in specific roles and industries, for example where there are billable hours. However, when used without a clear reason it will likely be treated with suspicion by employees.“We recommend that employers be transparent about what they’re monitoring and why, consulting with staff to make sure these measures are necessary and relevant to their role. Employers need to demonstrate how any monitoring software used can benefit employees, while also respecting their privacy and encouraging a culture of trust.”Acceptability of monitoring home workers
The survey, part of the CIPD series ‘Technology, the Workplace and People Management’, found that 39 per cent of respondents did not feel any measures to collect information on regular home workers were acceptable.Among the measures supported by those who did support monitoring, almost a quarter favoured tracking the amount of time spent on billable tasks for clients, while a similar proportion backed monitoring the quantity, but not the content, of emails sent.Slightly smaller proportions favoured recording how much time employees spent on their laptops; monitoring work outside normal office hours; and time spent on non-work-related websites.Matching monitoring to culture
Ronni Zehavi, CEO and co-founder at HiBob, commented: “Ultimately, how a business decides to measure performance, growth or company success will reflect on that organisation’s culture."Progressive businesses understand that a healthy culture based on transparency, communication and flexibility drives sustainable growth and positive business outcomes."It is intrinsically tied to being able to attract and retain the best talent. Survey findings bear this out, with HR decision makers placing organisation culture in the list of top five business focuses for the next 12 months."Mr Zehavi said that it was understandable for businesses to want to gain insights into what their staff spent time doing and how long it took them to complete tasks."But," he added, "collecting more information than is needed to fulfil any audit purpose could undermine trust and impact the relationship between staff and employers, irrevocably damaging employee engagement - the cornerstone of any HR strategy.”Subscribe now to Think Global People magazine and read more from David in the autumn issue.
Subscribe to Relocate Extra, our monthly newsletter, to get all the latest international assignments and global mobility news.Relocate’s new Global Mobility Toolkit provides free information, practical advice and support for HR, global mobility managers and global teams operating overseas.Access hundreds of global services and suppliers in our Online Directory
©2024 Re:locate magazine, published by Profile Locations, Spray Hill, Hastings Road, Lamberhurst, Kent TN3 8JB. All rights reserved. This publication (or any part thereof) may not be reproduced in any form without the prior written permission of Profile Locations. Profile Locations accepts no liability for the accuracy of the contents or any opinions expressed herein.