CIPD research finds gender pay gap for FTSE 100 CEOs
A recently released study by the CIPD and the High Pay Centre has shown an existing gap between the salary of male and female CEOs in FTSE 100 companies. Dr Sumita Ketkar discusses why the gap exists.
How significant is the gap?
The CIPD, the professional body for HR and people development, and the High Pay Centre, the independent think tank, recently released its FTSE 100 annual CEO pay survey.Dr Sumita Ketkar, senior lecturer in leadership and professional development at Westminster Business School, believes the figures are disappointing.Dr Ketkar said, “A quick glance at the top ten earners from the FTSE 100 companies shows male CEOs earned on average £4.7 million last year, compared with £2.6 million on average for women. “With only six female FTSE 100 CEOs, the position remains very much a ‘big boys club’.”The survey follows the story of a significant gender pay gap for BBC top earners, which recently dominated national headlines. Dr Ketka suggests that this further brings this topic to the fore, given the high female workforce participation in the UK.Related stories:
- Gender equality 4.0: From binary to balanced approaches
- Average salary of FTSE 100 CEOs drops by 17 per cent in 2016
- New data on shared parental leave suggests more to be done: CIPD
Moving the conversation beyond the ‘feministic’ narrative
She continued, “These statistics are disappointing and make high-sounding debates about gender equality seem almost farcical. However, in order to ‘fix’ the under-representation of women in top jobs it is important to unpick some of the reasons underlying the widening pay gap as women advance in their careers.”“Even though high-level reporting statistics may not tell the full story, they help start an inclusive conversation across society beyond the ‘feministic’ narrative.“At a societal level too, it is important that women are encouraged to embrace traditional male jobs – i.e. including accounting, engineering and technology subjects such as artificial intelligence and robotics.“These factors are all inter-related and therefore solutions must be holistic and integrated.”“Wage inequality, reflective of the vertical segregation between men and women, is a product of several inter-related factors. Fewer women tend to rise to executive level jobs and boards because they often leave the workforce at critical junctures in their lives, despite family friendly policies.“Even women executives who do progress to the higher echelons, tend to occupy top jobs in smaller companies or in relatively low paid sectors. Biases in pay negotiations and performance for performance payout, and in-group behaviours, such as ‘boys’ club’ networking, make the gap even more entrenched. This may not necessarily be at the CEO level but occurs at other top jobs such as CFO and COO.“If economic parity is to be achieved, it is imperative that a multipronged approach is adopted. Businesses must take proactive measures for tackling inequity.“This could include for example having a greater proportion of women in the compensation committees determining executive pay and performance related bonuses in companies, supporting women through the talent pipeline by mentoring and training, and minimising unconscious biases during organisational practices such as staffing, training, promoting and rewarding. At the public policy level, initiatives and regulations such as requiring businesses to measure the gender pay gap and report it, and banning adverts that substantiate gender stereotypes can help to some extent. “How long it will take to make the gender gap nonexistent depends on how quickly changes are kick started and maintained, a more synergistic approach will decidedly help.”For related news and features, visit our Human Resources section.Access hundreds of global services and suppliers in our Online Directory Get access to our free Global Mobility Toolkit©2024 Re:locate magazine, published by Profile Locations, Spray Hill, Hastings Road, Lamberhurst, Kent TN3 8JB. All rights reserved. This publication (or any part thereof) may not be reproduced in any form without the prior written permission of Profile Locations. Profile Locations accepts no liability for the accuracy of the contents or any opinions expressed herein.